Wednesday, April 6, 2011

IAR Spring Captiol Conference

As a Realtor we do many things to protect private property rights. On April 5, myself as president of the Illinois members of the Quad City Area Realtor Association and Realtor's from all over the state of Illinois went to Springfield to make sure our legislature knows where we stand on certain bills that are on the floor right now. I just wanted to inform my readers of what Realtors are doing to protect your private property rights. Below is a synopsis of the issues and where the Illinois Associationof Realtors stand.

FORECLOSURE ISSUES-Vacant/Abandoned Property-Unlimited Municipal Powers-OPPOSE
Illinois already has an extensive body of law to give municipalities extraordinary powers to clean up and secure abandoned property, and they have a superior lien to recover their costs.  If  necessary, they can even take over the property, and pass i to n to a non-profit or other entity to redevelop.  The IAR  has helped craft these laws over the years , with a balanced approach that allows local governments to address the blight of abandoned property, but provides a uniform scope and process for  these local powers so that property rights are preserved and parties are offered due process.

OPPOSE House Bill 1109 (Yarbrough), as amended by House Amendment #3, which provides an unlimited, blanket grant of authority to all municipalities to pass whatever rules, regulations,and fees they see fit regarding vacant property.  This legislation has none of the protections or limitations provided in existing laws on vacant property, and would throw out the uniformity of current laws in lieu of a patchwork of whatever municipalities decide to put in there ordinances.

House Bill 1109 would also make lenders, certain prior owners,trustees, and other beneficiaries responsible for whatever rules the municipality enacts, and grants all of the  entities and their agents complete immunity from civil and criminal liability while entering premises to enforce or comply with the actual or potential violations of the rules and regulations of the municipality. We think this is a dangerous precedent fraught with potential abuses, particularly when there is not limitation or guidance as to what will be in these local rules and regulations.

WORK WITH the sponsor, lending groups, and other interested parties on another concept included in HOUSE BILL 1109,which would shorten the redemption period on foreclosed properties hen property is deemed to be abandoned. The idea here is to find ways to enable action to be taken on abandoned properties sooner.

Allow municipalities to Create Separate LAND BANKS-OPPOSE
OPPOSE House Bill 760 (Yarbrough), as proposed in House Amendment #3, creates a new law to allow ALL municipalities to establish a new entity called a Land Bank Authority (LBA). These LBA's are essentially a separate real estate corp. that may acquire, buy, sell, rent, hold, manage, and develop any real estate within its jurisdiction (municipalities could create their own LBA, or partner with others to create a regional LBA. The IAR does not believe that this is  a necessary or wise tool to deal with foreclosure issues.

This LBA concept differs from other  redevelopment tools (TIFS, etc...) in that the government becomes the owner, developer, and speculator.  The IAR does not  believe this is a proper role for local governments, nor one they can afford to b particularly successful in.

Work with the sponsor and proponents to identify and correct any problems or inefficiencies in existing abandoned property laws to make them more usable and effective for municipalities.

LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND TAXATION ISSUES
OPPOSE HB1384 (GORDON)/HB 3407 (COlVIN),which would  enable local governments to collect on liens for property maintenance and nuisance clean-up by putting the charges on the owner's property tax bill.  We oppose this ongoing effort by local unites to collect debts on the tax bill.

OPPOSE HB 1323 (RILEY), which would  allow ALL municipalities to license and regulate ALL businesses.  This flies in the face of state license laws, like the Real Estate License Act, that preempt home rule units and reserves such licensing to the state to ensure a statewide standard.  This bill would also allow municipalities to enact landlord and rental property licensing without any limitations.

SUPPORT SB 1230(LAUZEN)  which expands to Cook county the new provision in the  Property Tax COde (also advocated by IAR) that require boards of review to consider (compulsory sales) of comparable properties for the purpose of revising and correcting assessments.

RENTAL PROPERTY ISSUES
OPPOSE HB 1607 (DAVIS) WHICH WOULD  ENACT UNCLEAR AND UNNECESSARY REGULATIONS ON THE CHARGING OF "APPLICATION FEES' BY LANDLORDS. Subjects the  landlord to monetary penalties, court costs, and attorney's fees if the new rules aren't followed. There has been no case made that this is a problem, and this is unnecessary regulation that exposes good landlords to lawsuits.

SUPPORT HB 1309 (DELUCA)/SB 1766 (WILHELMI), which are works in progress, and seek to amend the eviction provisions for criminal activity in the Code of Civil Procedure to provide both local governments and landlords a more clear and effective tool to deal with tenants that are engaging in criminal activity and other  disruptive behavior on the premises. This is an alternative approach to the 'landlord licensing' approach we have seen in the past.

OPPOSE HB 1008 (YARBROUGH), amended by House Amendment #1, which would require any person or business that obtains personal information to check the  credit of a consumer to carry a bond of at least $250,0000.  This bond would indemnify the consumer for any theft , loss, or unauthorized sharing of the personal information of the personal information used in the credit check. The bill makes violation of the requirement a violation of the Consumer Fraud Act.

limitation on developers Contracting for 'Retainage'
OPPOSE HOUSE BILL 1292 (LANG) which prohibits a developer of a non-residential property from contracting for more than 5% "retainage". A retainage provision enables a developer to withhold a certain portion of the contracted amount until completion to ensure that work is completed satisfactorily, passes inspections, and liens are released. The IAR opposes the state inserting itself into this private contractual matter between two business entities. (I do believe this bill was shut down today (April 6).


These are just some of the issues that Realtor's and there lobbyists deal with on a annual basis.Feel free to call, e-mail or text me if you have any questions regarding real estate.

No comments:

Post a Comment